|
Brandon Hamber
The kitchen of a small house in downtown Sao Paulo is the
meeting place of the Comissao de Familiares de Mortos e
Desaparecidos Politicas (Commission of the Families of Political
Murder Victims and the Disappeared), an organisation of family
members whose loved ones were killed during the military
dictatorship in Brazil. The kitchen is lined with filing cabinets
that contain information collected by the families on some 400
cases of murder and disappearances . Unlike in South Africa,
there was no official investigation in Brazil following the
military regime. Without any governmental support, it has been
these families and human rights activists who have had to try to
find information on the missing and the dead. Some 20 years since
the disappearances the relatives are still trying to establish
the truth about what happened to their loved ones.
During the period of military rule in Brazil (1964-1985)
thousands of citizens were persecuted, forced into exile,
murdered and tortured. The official lists compiled by human
rights organisations report thousands of cases of torture, 240
people murdered and 144 missing. Relative to other countries in
South America these numbers are negligible. Comparisons to the
30000 disappeared in Argentina are of little comfort to the
relatives who feel that the atrocities committed by the Brazilian
government have received little attention since the passing of a
general amnesty in 1979. Although a civilian government was
instated in 1985, the families of the disappeared have continued
to seek the truth and draw attention to the numerous atrocities
carried out by the past government.
Groups of this nature are not uncommon around the world and
such organisations have emerged in at least 16 countries. Most of
these organisations have developed spontaneously. Their roots lie
often with relatives who have met as a result of their common
experiences. Stories of meeting one another at government offices
and police stations while seeking information about their loved
ones are common. Groups exist in almost all Latin American
countries and have also been established in African countries
such as Chad, Ethiopia and Morocco. Similar groups also operate
in Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Turkey, Croatia and in China.
These groups are diverse in membership and objectives, but
generally share three common aims. These are: a demand for
information about what happened to their loved ones; a need for
official acknowledgment; and a quest for justice in respect of
those responsible. Certainly in Latin America, truth, social and
psychological rehabilitation and acknowledgment, are generally
placed before the need for compensation. As most of the groups
have developed in the context of blanket amnesties, there is an
ongoing demand for justice. Impunity for crimes committed under
military regimes is the issue that sits hardest with relatives of
the murdered and disappeared throughout the world.
The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) is
one of the boldest international efforts to try to meet some of
these needs. Unlike a blanket amnesty , the South African TRC
trades full-disclosure or truth recovery for amnesty - thus,
potentially meeting victims needs for truth and public
acknowledgment. In South Africa, amnesty is justified as being
necessary to ensure peace and logistically it is argued that
prosecutions could not have been guaranteed due to inefficiencies
in the criminal justice system and a lack of access to
information necessary to sustain successful prosecutions.
Most victims would probably agree that an investigation like
the TRC is a necessary first step to uncovering the truth.
However, the onus is not on victims to accept any amnesty
agreements. Rather, the TRC has the responsibility to explain
amnesties and has to be prepared for the angry responses. It is
critical, that it is not demanded, either implicitly or
explicitly, that victims are expected to forgive the
perpetrators. Families' anger, or other emotional responses,
to the granting of amnesty to perpetrators has to be legitimised
and space provided for people to express their feelings. The
lessons from other countries are that amnesties are always
unpopular. Ironically, if the truth is uncovered this may
stimulate rather than eliminate families demands for justice.
Furthermore, even with the efforts of the TRC, the varied
nature of the cases and the impossible search for the truth means
that the issues of the past can be expected to remain on the
agenda for many years. Despite the Chilean Commission of 1991
being reported as the most successful Truth Commission to date,
today people still seek to report past cases and many are unaware
that the Commission even took place.
In South Africa we need to guard against the attitude that
once the TRC is over, the chapter on the past is closed. For the
victims of past abuses the chapter only closes when they are
personally ready. This can be more challenging than it sounds.
Take the one faction of the victims' group the Mothers of
the Plaza de Mayo in Argentina, for example, who refuse any form
of reparation or compensation. They will not even participate in
any official investigations or bodies and insist that "you
took them away alive we want them back alive." Perhaps they
only want others to experience the frustration they have felt and
are determined to offer constant reminders that, in reality,
there is nothing that can ever be done to replace their missing
loved ones. As bizarre as this extreme position sounds, if we are
to truly sympathise with victims we are required to understand
it.
In Brazil, the government has recently agreed to compensate
the families of the murdered and disappeared , but the relatives
say that compensation was never their goal. They see this as the
government's final attempt to buy their silence and close
the book on the past, but without revealing the true facts of
what happened. As a result, the families of the disappeared in
Brazil are referred to by both those from the left and the right
as dinosaurs . They are seen as harping on the past. The society
is tired of these mothers who will not be appeased or who cannot
forget
The real question is: at what point does a society become
tired of hearing the voices of the past? In South Africa, despite
even the most valiant efforts by the TRC, we can expect to hear
the voices of victims long into the future. The challenge to all
South Africans is to learn to cope with and accept as legitimate,
the ongoing anger and even impossible demands of victims who will
continue their struggle for an ever elusive truth.
Brandon Hamber is a clinical psychologist and
the co-ordinator of the Project on Truth and Reconciliation at
the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.
In Mail & Guardian, Vol 13, No 2, 17 - 23
January 1997.
Posted on 1999-01-01
remarks:1 |