|
Asian Human Rights Commission
Three Commissions created by the Sri Lankan government have
established the disappearances of 16,742 people. While the claim
that the number of disappearances is actually much larger needs
to be further investigated, the immediate issue now is: What
conclusions can be drawn from the facts already established?
It should be underlined that those listed as disappeared in
the Commission Reports do not include people killed by the
rebel groups. The disappeared listed in the Reports include
only people who were arrested by the law enforcement agencies and
went missing thereafter. Thus, the issue is entirely one of the
responsibility of state officers, even if some state agencies
sometimes may have used people who did not belong to their
agencies to carry out the disappearances.
According to a statement issued in early September 1998, the
only approach proposed by the government thus far is to prosecute
the people responsible for the disappearances, a large number of
whom have been identified. Even if many people involved in the
disappearances are identified, however, they would only be a
fraction of those who have caused the disappearances of 16,742
people. This is because the approach presently adopted treats
criminal involvement too narrowly: it only includes those
directly responsible for the disappearances using direct criminal
liability as the sole basis of liability.
A very important aspect, however, that needs to be considered
is implied liability on the basis of the vast number of proven
cases of disappearance. Implied liability arises both from acts
of commission which contributed to causing disappearances and
from acts of omission which failed to prevent disappearances from
occurring. The responsibility for acts of both commission and
omission rests primarily on the government of the time. The
government of the time cannot claim any valid defense in this
regard; neither causing the disappearances nor failure to prevent
them can be justified in any way. Even in an insurgency, causing
disappearances is not a legally valid combat tactic.
In addition to the government's criminal liability, which
arises solely from the fact of the disappearances themselves,
there are other factors adding to the gravity of these cases.
These include acts of conspiracy to cause these disappearances;
acts of encouragement of these disappearances; acts to supervise
the carrying out of these disappearances; and acts of failure to
divulge information regarding these disappearances. Thus, the
liability for these disappearances would spread to include
leaders of the former government, regional leaders of the former
government, higher officers of the law enforcement agencies and
higher regional officers of the areas where the disappearances
have taken place.
The primary consideration in dealing with these disappearances
should be to create a political and social agreement to avoid the
occurrence of disappearances in the future. This is an even more
urgent need, as there are complaints that about 600 people on the
Jaffna Peninsula have become missing since its capture by
government forces in December 1995.
It is not possible to restore confidence in the state's
willingness and determination to control its law enforcement
agencies without taking serious action regarding the large number
of disappearances that have been established. Furthermore, the
law enforcement officers themselves need to be convinced of their
criminal liability. Law enforcement officers could claim that
they have been unfairly treated, however, if the politicians who
were the architects of the policy causing these disappearances
remain immune to criminal liability.
The public has a right to know the complete details of how
such a vast number of disappearances took place in the country.
This is especially true for those among them who are surviving
family members of those who disappeared. Full disclosure of the
entire process may help society, particularly those directly
concerned, to feel that justice has been done at last and to
believe that the justice system may recover from the deep decline
it has been suffering because of the disappearances.
Whether the suitable mode of justice in this instance is one
of direct criminal trials or one similar to the Truth Commission
in South Africa is left for the present government to decide in
consultation with the people. Revenge is not the driving force
for such prosecutions. Establishing justice against gross
injustice, recreating confidence in the system of justice and
helping people and society arrive at genuine reconciliation are
the primary considerations. It is quite likely that many police
officers would come forward to reveal atrocities committed at the
time if they were given the opportunity and the protection. In an
earlier issue of Human Rights Solidarity (November 1996,
Volume 12), we reproduced the translation of a confession along
with a long poem written by a senior police officer about the
incidents at the time that these disappearances took place.
Recommended Action
To assist the people of Sri Lanka in this process, you are
encouraged to write letters to the government of Sri Lanka and
the U.N. Rapporteur on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances,
asking them to take urgent action on this matter. If you would
like, you may use the sample letters below or write similar
letters to the following addresses:
Her Excellency President Chandrika B. Kumaratunga
Presidential Residence
Temple Tree
Colombo 3
Sri Lanka
Fax: (94) 1-333-703
Your Excellency:
We have learned of the findings of three Commissions of
Inquiry into the disappearances which have taken place in your
country. We are shocked to hear that 16,742 people have
disappeared and the claim by other agencies that the number is,
in fact, much larger. While we have been saddened by such a large
number of gross acts of inhumanity, we are concerned about
further complaints of disappearances which have happened in
recent times. We would request that action be taken on the basis
of the Reports of these Commissions to bring to justice all who
have been involved in causing these disappearances. We hope by
genuinely redressing the grave wrong done to these people and
their families that peace can be restored to your country.
Mr. Ivan Tosevski
Chairperson/Rapporteur
U.N. Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances
c\o U.N. Centre for Human Rights
Palais des Nations
1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
Fax: (41) 22-917-0092
Ms. Mary Robinson
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Palais des Nations
1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
Telephone: (41) 22-734-6011, 731-0211
Fax: (41) 22-733-9879
Fax: (41) 22-917-0022 (HOTLINE-Human Rights)
Dear Mr. Tosevski/Ms. Robinson:
You are aware of the findings of the three Commissions in Sri
Lanka which have established the disappearance of 16,472 people.
We urge you to take suitable action to bring to justice all of
the people who were involved in these actions.
Posted on 1999-01-01
remarks:1 |